3 Simple Steps to Evaluate a Web Vulnerability Scanner
Summary: PortSwigger Research outlines a three-step method for evaluating web vulnerability scanners, starting with testing on a "scan-me" site - a deliberately vulnerable application with a documented list of known issues and attack surface. The article recommends comparing scanners on true positives (issues known to exist that the scanner found) and false positives, and notes that modern applications make attack surface discovery harder, causing many scanners to miss content.
Bottom line: The article states that excessive false positives cost scanner users time and money to investigate issues that don't exist, and that many scanners fail to discover content when scanning modern web applications - so a scanner's headline detection count says little without a known target to measure it against.
Read the original at PortSwigger Research ↗
- Topics
- Vulnerabilities & Patching
- Related
- Attackers Exploit UnrealIRCd Flaw That Enables Server-Level Command Injection Cyber Risks · Nov 14, 2026U.S. CISA adds Check Point and UnrealIRCd flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog Cyber Risks · Nov 14, 2026PostgreSQL Patches 52 Flaws, Including 22-Year-Old Bug Enabling Authenticated RCE Cyber Risks · Nov 13, 2026