Court Favors Small Business in eBanking Fraud Case
Summary: A Michigan court ruled Comerica Bank liable for more than $560,000 stolen in a January 2009 cyber heist, after Judge Patrick J. Duggan found the bank failed to act in good faith when it processed 97 fraudulent wire transfers from Experi-Metal Inc.'s account within a few hours. The attack began when an EMI employee entered a one-time passcode on a phishing site imitating Comerica's online banking portal, and the bank did not stop more than a dozen additional fraudulent transfers after it first detected the activity four hours in.
Bottom line: Businesses do not get the legal protections consumers have against cyber theft, so the $560,000 loss sat with the small business until a court shifted it to the bank - and Comerica is appealing. The court's focus on fraud detection mechanisms, not just the token-based security procedure, puts every bank's monitoring of wire activity on the line for the customers it serves.
Read the original at Krebs on Security ↗
- Topics
- Data Breaches
- Related
- TSMC employee data breach linked to cloud provider Cyber Risks · Nov 15, 2026Data Breach at La Poste Subsidiary Maileva Affects 22 Million People in France Cyber Risks · Nov 15, 2026City of Osaka warns of data breach impacting 1 million as Japan reels from dozens of cyber incidents Cyber Risks · Nov 13, 2026